24小时 arXiv AI 研究 实时更新
人工智能研究论文动态
LATEST UPDATES
最新获取
2026-08-18
-
When Do LLMs Apply the Wrong Law? Diagnosing LLM Failures in Temporal Legal Reasoning
arXiv:2608.14610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal reasoning tasks such as legal judgment prediction (LJP) require identifying the temporally correct version of the law governing a case -- a capability we term temporal applicable-law determination. However, whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably perform this task remains unexplored. In this paper, we construct a benchmark to evaluate LLMs on temporal applicable-law determination, and systematically investigate why they fail at temporal legal reasoning. Our experiments reveal four key findings. First, LLMs exhibit a strong bias toward applying the most recently enacted law, regardless of when the legally relevant facts occurred. Second, this bias does not stem from an inability to understand that laws have temporal scope, nor from a lack of knowledge about historical statutes. Third, we provide behavioral evidence that reinforcement-learning-shaped explicit reasoning may be a key mechanism: while improving general reasoning ability, it reduces the diversity of reasoning paths, causing models to converge on applying the current law. Fourth, this produces a counterintuitive inverse relationship: models with stronger general reasoning ability tend to perform worse on temporal legal reasoning. Our findings offer concrete guidance for future work on improving LLM performance in temporally grounded legal reasoning.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Position: Medical AI Neglects Real Treatment Outcomes
arXiv:2608.14598v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical AI has rapidly improved its ability to perform diagnostic and prognostic tasks that lead to treatment decisions. But understanding of treatment itself is still inadequately trained and evaluated, using human opinions and syntheses (especially texts such as biomedical publications and clinical practice guidelines) rather than actual underlying data on treatment outcomes. This neglect seriously limits the potential of medical AI, and is already causing deficiencies in both frontier models and major benchmarks, as argued in this position paper. Real treatment outcomes, drawn from sources such as observational databases and randomized experiments, should be substantially incorporated into both training and evaluation. Improving these outcomes should be reemphasized as the downstream goal of all medical AI.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Toward Safe LLM Agents: A Survey of Specification, Verification, and Enforcement
arXiv:2608.14590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly perform irreversible real-world actions, including database updates, API calls, file operations, and autonomous use of tools. However, no existing system provides formally grounded, task-level safety guarantees for the plans these agents generate. Research remains fragmented across specification, verification, and enforcement, limiting understanding of the strengths and limitations of existing approaches. To address this gap, we conducted a PRISMA 2020 systematic review of 38 studies published between 2022 and 2026 and retrieved from six academic databases. Our analysis reveals four key findings. First, the specification bottleneck remains the primary challenge: natural-language-to-formal translation achieves only 24% to 35% semantic correctness, undermining downstream verification. Second, runtime monitoring is the most mature enforcement strategy, reducing unsafe actions by 40% to 65% in controlled settings, but it does not provide complete safety guarantees. Third, the verifier tax shows that blocking 94% of unsafe actions can still result in less than 5% safe task completion because agents exploit alternative unsafe paths. Finally, no existing approach simultaneously achieves soundness, scalability, semantic correctness, and task-level safety preservation. We contribute a three-level taxonomy, a comparative analysis of existing techniques, a synthesis of evidence on the verifier tax, and a ten-problem research agenda for trustworthy agentic AI.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
The Hallucination Snowball: Modeling Error Propagation as State Transitions in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines
arXiv:2608.14588v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential multi-agent LLM pipelines chain specialized agents without verification at handoffs, creating a structural flaw with measurable and severe consequences. We show that hallucinations injected at Stage 1 do not merely persist; they transform: raw numerical facts become derived computations, then narrative prose, then editorially approved conclusions. At each transformation, detectability degrades near-irreversibly. We formalize this as the hallucination snowball effect, a first-order Markov process over four states (Raw Fact $\to$ Derived $\to$ Narrative $\to$ Invisible) with empirically measured per-boundary escape probabilities of 24.6%, 48.3%, and 89.3%. Across 346 automatically injected hallucinations in a 4-agent financial analysis pipeline on FinanceBench, gpt-4o detection drops from 72.0% at Stage 1 to 50.9% at Stage 4, and 23.7% of hallucinations survive completely undetected in the final output. Even the strongest model tested (Qwen3.5-397B-A17B, 87.0% at Stage 1) faces a structural ceiling; projected Stage 4 detection is only ${\sim}$60--65%. Critically, boundary gates using identical RAG verification tools reduce hallucination survival from 58.4% to 16.2% versus end-of-pipeline checking (Cohen's $h = -0.911$, $p < 0.000001$), while end-checking alone achieves merely 2.3 pp improvement over no verification. When you verify matters more than whether you verify. Our model predicts survival for $n$-agent linear pipelines and prescribes optimal verification resource allocation: invest at $S_1{\to}S_2$ first, wher
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
An Agentic Framework Using Rules and LLMs for Embedding and Annotating Descriptive Document Layouts: A Plant Science Use Case
arXiv:2608.14587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background: Recent advances in information retrieval (IR) leverage both dense and sparse representations, large language models (LLMs), and specialized retrieval models to improve ranking accuracy, relevance, and cross-lingual performance. Complementary techniques such as passage indexing, document layout analysis, and semantic knowledge representation further enhance retrieval effectiveness by capturing fine-grained contextual and structural information. Emerging agentic LLM frameworks extend these capabilities by enabling planning, iterative reasoning, tool use, and multi-agent collaboration, thereby broadening applications across diverse domains. These frameworks also emphasize rigorous evaluation, ethical considerations, and trustworthiness, ensuring responsible deployment in real-world settings. We propose a modular, agent-based pipeline for botanical trait extraction. Optical character recognition (OCR) converts PDFs into machine-readable text, while segmentation and indexing organize content by genus and species. Rule-based parsers extract structured botanical traits, and ensembles of large language models (LLMs) expand trait vocabularies and resolve ambiguities. This approach ensures accurate species recognition, scalable annotation, and explainable integration of textual botanical descriptions, enabling robust and interpretable data extraction across large botanical corpora. Results: Using three regional botanical datasets, our system extracted 55,737 trait annotations across 4,961 species, averaging 9.1 traits per sp
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Euclid-Omni : A Unified Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Plane Geometry
arXiv:2608.14585v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Euclidean geometry is a compelling testbed for AI reasoning, as it demands the combination of intuitive diagram understanding, axiomatic deduction, and algebraic computation. Yet, existing approaches typically address only a subset of these abilities or struggle with competition-level problems. We introduce \textit{Euclid-Omni}, a unified neuro-symbolic framework that couples a formal geometry system with Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to tackle both calculation- and proving-style problems, in formal and natural languages, up to Olympiad-level difficulty. At its core, we develop \textit{Euclidea}, a versatile symbolic geometry solver that automatically generates reasoning steps through deductive inference and algebraic computation. Building on this, we develop a data-generation pipeline that synthesizes symbolic problems and solutions, renders diagrams, and translates them into natural language, producing large-scale, diverse datasets for training LLMs and VLMs across a wide range of reasoning settings. Experiments show that VLMs trained on our synthetic data achieve superior performance on calculation tasks, and that LLMs combined with \textit{Euclidea} are competitive with state-of-the-art systems on Olympiad-level proving problems, despite using orders of magnitude less compute and training data. Code and scripts are publicly available at https://github.com/20171130/Euclid-Omni
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
OGX: An Open-Source, Vendor-Neutral Generative AI Application Server
arXiv:2608.14580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: OGX (Open GenAI Stack) is an open-source AI application server and Python library that implements the APIs of major frontier labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) with pluggable backend providers. Developers building agentic AI applications--such as retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, multi-turn agents, and tool-calling workflows--can develop against a single API surface and deploy with any combination of inference engine, vector database, and safety backend, without changing application code. OGX's primary focus is the Responses API for server-side agentic orchestration, conforming to the Open Responses specification. The server also supports the Anthropic Messages API and Google GenAI Interactions API, decoupling SDK choice from model and deployment decisions. With over 20 inference providers, 13 vector store backends, and a companion Kubernetes Operator for production deployment, OGX serves as the self-hosted, model-agnostic backend for AI-powered developer tools including Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenCode, and OpenHands. The project has over 8,400 GitHub stars, 242 contributors, and 4,000 commits across nearly two years of public development.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
SKILL: Self-correcting Knowledge-guided Iterative Large Language Model Agent for Logic Optimization
arXiv:2608.14579v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Logic synthesis optimization poses significant challenges due to exponentially growing search spaces, sparse reward signals, and diverse logic structures. Traditional expert-designed flows lack adaptability, while reinforcement learning (RL) methods often suffer from low sample efficiency and limited interpretability. We introduce SKILL, a Self-correcting Knowledge-guided Iterative Large Language Model Agent that unifies multi-agent LLM reasoning and RL-based environment interaction for automated synthesis optimization. SKILL coordinates three specialized LLMs: GPT-4o for strategic planning, Claude Sonnet 4 for detailed reasoning, and Gemini 2.5 Pro for efficient analysis with a PPO-based RL agent that learns actionable policies through direct interaction with synthesis tools. A novel self-correcting module monitors environment feedback (PDA metrics), detects suboptimal behaviors, and invokes LLM-guided recovery strategies. Evaluations on IWLS, OpenCores, and EPFL benchmarks show SKILL achieves a 12.4 % PDA improvement over expert flows and 86.3% success rate on logic systems up to 500K gates.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Longitudinal and Graph-Augmented Prediction of Adolescent Substance Use Onset in the ABCD Study
arXiv:2608.14578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Early identification of adolescent substance-use risk is an important prevention challenge, yet the relative value of baseline characteristics, longitudinal trajectories, and relational context remains unclear. Using data from approximately 11,860 participants in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we compare cross-sectional, longitudinal, and graph-based approaches for predicting alcohol sipping, alcohol use, marijuana use, and alcohol/marijuana use. We evaluate tree-based models, recurrent neural networks, and Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (T-GCNs) constructed from family, school, and feature-similarity graphs. Longitudinal models consistently outperform baseline models, with temporal XGBoost achieving the strongest standalone performance. Although T-GCNs generally do not surpass temporal XGBoost, graph-derived risk scores provide complementary information. Combining temporal XGBoost and T-GCN predictions through score-level stacking yields the best performance across all outcomes, achieving AUC-ROC values above 0.79. Feature analyses identify peer deviance, age, externalizing symptoms, parental monitoring, cultural norms, and neighborhood context as important predictors of substance use onset. These findings demonstrate the value of longitudinal modeling for substance-use prediction and suggest that graph-based representations can provide effective auxiliary risk signals.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit System
arXiv:2608.14571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With soaring submission counts, stricter reciprocal review policies, widespread adoption of platforms like OpenReview, and without the offsetting pressure of publication fees, the machine learning (ML) community has one of the largest scholarly presences among all scientific fields. And yet, \textbf{almost \textit{everyone} has \textit{many} unpleasant things to share about their review experience.} Worse, there is little public space to seriously discuss, let alone debate, what makes a review system effective or how it might be improved.\quad In this position paper, we expand our discussion from two core problems: \textit{How can we reasonably limit submission volume?} and \textit{How can we incentivize good and discourage bad reviewing?} We first assess the strengths and shortcomings of existing attempts to address such problems. Specifically, we present four takes on some popular conference mechanisms and propose two alternative designs for improvement.\quad Our general position is that meaningful improvement in ML peer review won't come from polite best-practice suggestions tucked into Calls for Papers or Reviewer Guidelines: it requires \textbf{enforceable yet fine-grained procedural safeguards} paired with \textbf{a currency-like credit system (e.g., our proposed \textit{OpenReview Points})}. ML practitioners can ``earn'' such points by contributing good review practices, and ``spend'' them across one or multiple major conferences to redeem different kinds of ``perks,'' such as complimentary registration or the right to
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Position: Certified Correctness in Neural Constraint Reasoning Requires Symbolic Integration
arXiv:2608.14569v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural solvers for constraint satisfaction problems have achieved remarkable in-distribution accuracy, yet they suffer from a fundamental limitation persistent constraint violations occur under distribution shifts even when the model reports high confidence. This position paper argues that when hard constraints exist and the cost of verification is relatively low, neural constraint reasoning must prioritize symbolic integration over pure learning. We justify our focus on Sudoku as a representative NP-complete testbed because it exhibits a sharp asymmetry between easy verification and hard solving: checking a candidate solution requires only polynomial time $O(n^{2})$, while finding a solution may require exponential search. Through a comprehensive survey of solving methods spanning deterministic algorithms, metaheuristic optimization, learning-based approaches, and language-conditioned reasoning, we demonstrate that neural-only methods without instance-level certification fail to achieve the provable correctness that symbolic and neuro-symbolic approaches provide. We advocate for a bidirectional integration in which neural methods enhance symbolic solvers by learning heuristics and converting percepts into symbols, while symbolic methods verify neural outputs to ensure their reliability. To operationalize this position, we propose a multi-agent certified reasoning framework that demonstrates how this integration can achieve both computational efficiency and provable correctness.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws
arXiv:2608.14568v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems become deeply integrated into critical global infrastructure, the urgency for robust governance frameworks has intensified. However, current approaches, led by jurisdiction-specific laws, policies, and voluntary frameworks such as the EU AI Act, China's algorithm governance, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework in the U.S., create a fragmented regulatory landscape. In this position paper, we argue that \textbf{\textit{AI governance must be built not on laws alone, but on ISO-like interoperability protocols that enable standardized, machine-readable risk communication across borders}}. Drawing on the success of the GDPR, which was operationalized through standards like ISO 27001 and Privacy by Design, we propose the development of standardized AI \textit{nutrition labels} containing unified metrics for bias, energy usage, and data provenance to facilitate cross-jurisdictional compliance. These manifests would lower barriers for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), reduce redundant regulatory efforts, and build public trust. The paper addresses concerns that standards may stifle innovation by advocating for modular, versioned protocols designed to evolve in tandem with technological change. Overall, we call for a shift from siloed legal compliance toward interoperable technical conformance, enabling a shared global language for responsible AI deployment.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
From Doyle to AGM: A Survey and an Implementation Roadmap for Belief Change
arXiv:2608.14567v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents a targeted narrative review establishing the historical and theoretical foundations for computational belief change implementation. Seeded by Doyle and London's foundational 1980 taxonomy, we trace the evolution of belief revision from computational origins through the theoretical transformation of the AGM framework to contemporary approaches. Our analysis demonstrates how pre-AGM computational pragmatism relates to AGM theoretical constructs, revealing both continuities and transformations across this evolution. We analyze how each taxonomical category evolved in the post-AGM era, identifying the theoretical foundations and historical precedents that inform contemporary implementation challenges. This foundation enables subsequent research into robust computational blueprints that synthesize historical insights with formal guarantees, providing the baseline for systematic implementation analysis and engineering-focused belief change research.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Position: Evaluations of AI Moral Reasoning Still Miss Half of the Picture
arXiv:2608.14566v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work on evaluating the moral competence of large language models (LLMs) has focused primarily on what we call the moral value problem, i.e., whether model outputs align with human moral values. In contrast, the moral norm problem, i.e., whether models can identify and correctly apply context-sensitive moral norms, remains underexplored. We posit that this imbalance stems from the field's reliance on descriptive ethics frameworks, such as Moral Foundations Theory and Kohlberg's stages of moral development, which emphasize value representation over normative application. We review existing benchmarks and evaluation methods, and show that they cluster heavily around the value problem, while discussion regarding normative ethics remains underrepresented. We identify three crucial gaps: (i) the absence of high-quality ground-truth data for moral norms and their applications, (ii) insufficient evaluation of intermediate reasoning processes, and (iii) limited attention to the identification of morally relevant features in context. Subsequently, we propose a research agenda that includes the development of standardized formal representations for normative theories, the construction of expert-annotated datasets capturing norm application, and evaluation protocols that explicitly distinguish between values-level and norms-level competence. Our goal is to encourage a more systematic study of normative reasoning in LLMs.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Position: AI Lock-In Is in Progress, and We Must Be Prepared
arXiv:2608.14565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI safety research has mainly focused on two areas: technical alignment (ensuring AI systems produce human-aligned outputs) and the regulation of generative AI's societal impacts (including unemployment risk and labor market disruption). However, an equally important dimension remains underexplored: the risk inherent in dependence on AI systems themselves. In this position paper, we argue that AI safety research should address AI Lock-In, the phenomenon whereby excessive reliance on AI systems leads to human deskilling, diminishes human capacity for independent functioning, and creates systemic vulnerabilities when AI systems become unavailable or compromised. We highlight that AI Lock-In is a systemic threat that is already emerging at individual, societal, and national levels, one that could be dramatically amplified by AI service disruptions or geopolitical conflicts. Drawing on detailed scenarios, we investigate how AI Lock-In emerges and escalates across multiple levels, ranging from individual skill atrophy to national-scale infrastructure failures. To address this, we provide guidance on how such risks can be mitigated and prepared for at each level. We contend that proactively addressing AI Lock-In before such dependencies become entrenched, or even irreversible, is essential for preserving individual autonomy and national security.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Global AI Regulations for FAIR and Ethics in High-Risk Use Cases: A Comparative Review
arXiv:2608.14562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI governance is shifting from voluntary ethics to enforceable, risk-based regulation, yet cross-jurisdictional divergence creates compliance uncertainty for operators of high-stakes AI. We present a comparative matrix for the EU, US, and China that maps (i) risk classification triggers, (ii) binding obligations, (iii) enforcement and accountability mechanisms, and (iv) the degree to which FAIR principles are operationalised in practice. We stress-test the matrix on three high-impact domains: Electroencephalography (EEG)-guided rehabilitation robotics, AI-enabled debt collection in prospective Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) ecosystems, and AI-driven allocation of scarce Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) resources in emerging AI Factory infrastructures. Using primary legal texts and implementation evidence, we identify three recurring gaps: weak interoperability mandates, difficult operationalisation of cross-regime obligations (AI + sector regulation + data protection), and under-specified governance for critical digital infrastructure use cases. To bridge the implementation gap, we outline Knowledge Blocks, a machine-checkable compliance artefact pattern based on Resource Description Framework/Web Ontology Language (RDF/OWL), Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), and Provenance Ontology (PROV-O), enabling audit-ready compliance-by-design across multiple regimes.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
When to Communicate: Belief Distributions and KL Divergence for Principled Gating in Multi-Agent RL
arXiv:2608.14559v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective communication in multi-agent reinforcement learning requires agents to decide not only \textit{what} to communicate, but when? Existing approaches either communicate at every timestep or learn a binary gate through REINFORCE policy gradients \cite{singh2019}, a high-variance signal that produces unstable and uninterpretable gating behavior. I propose a principled alternative: agents communicate only when the KL divergence between their learned belief distributions exceeds a fixed threshold. Each agent maintains a belief distribution over a latent world state computed as a softmax over its LSTM hidden state, and communicates only when belief disagreement is large enough to justify information exchange. I evaluate this approach on the Predator-Prey benchmark from IC3Net \cite{singh2019} across two environment sizes with 5 seeds each, and on MPE simple\_spread \cite{lowe2017}, comparing against IC3Net, CommNet, and an independent controller. On PP 10$\times$10, IC3Net outperforms KL-belief at all thresholds. On the harder PP 20$\times$20, a threshold ablation over $\varepsilon \in \{0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0\}$ reveals an inverted U-shape: $\varepsilon=0.5$ achieves 73.84 average steps and 42\% success rate versus IC3Net's 75.31 steps and 31\%, a gap of 1.47 steps and 11 percentage points with tighter seed variance. On MPE, the belief head improves mean reward by 12 points and reduces variance by 26$\times$ even when gating is inactive, suggesting two orthogonal contributions: principled gating when beliefs can converge, and i
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
The Unwritten Benchmark: A New Challenge for Multimodal Machine Learning in Abstract Perceptual Reasoning
arXiv:2608.14558v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current multimodal models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in recognizing static visual and auditory content. However, their capacity for abstract perceptual reasoning, inferring unseen information from dynamic, generative processes, remains a critical and underexplored frontier. In this paper, we introduce The Unwritten Benchmark, a new challenge designed to probe this abstract perceptual and cognitive ability. We define the core task as acousto-kinematic word inference: models must decipher words, across 3 different writing styles, being written solely from the audio of pen scratches and the video of hand movements, without any visible ink trace. Our evaluation results reveal a profound gap between human and machine performance: while human participants achieve high ordered letter accuracy (over 80%), leading Multimodal Machine Learning Models, including GPT-4o and Gemini 2.5-Pro, struggle significantly, failing to surpass 10%. Furthermore, we identify a paradoxical fusion effect in the models, where providing both modalities often degrades performance rather than improving it. This finding indicates a fundamental breakdown in their ability to synthesize complementary perceptual cues for this cognitive task. These findings highlight significant limitations in both cross-modal causal reasoning and the understanding of the micro-kinematics essential for such cognitive and intuitive perceptual reasoning.
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
Large Language Models Show Metacognitive Sensitivity in Medical Reasoning
arXiv:2608.14552v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated and used in medicine, but clinical usefulness depends on answer accuracy and whether confidence tracks evidence quality and uncertainty. We developed a controlled, psychophysics-inspired clinical benchmark to test diagnostic choice and confidence behavior in a medical LLM. The benchmark focused on probable Alzheimer-type neurocognitive disorder (AT-NCD) versus depression-related cognitive impairment (DRCI). We generated 45 synthetic vignettes varying evidence strength, conflicting evidence, and missing information. Each vignette was presented under three prompt variants, yielding 135 trials. In a pilot run with gpt-4.1-nano, all trials produced valid structured outputs. Across forced-choice trials, diagnostic accuracy was 93.5%, mean confidence was 78.4%, and AUROC2 was 0.876. Confidence increased with evidence distance from the diagnostic boundary, decreased when information was missing, and remained higher on correct than incorrect trials after adjustment for evidence strength and prompt format. These findings indicate partial metacognitive sensitivity rather than globally uninformative confidence. However, errors clustered in moderate, conflicting AT-NCD cases, where the model shifted toward DRCI and retained more confidence than empirical accuracy justified. Model comparison suggested that confidence quality should be measured directly rather than inferred from benchmark accuracy or model capability alone. This study establishes a reproducible framework for evaluating
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情 -
FLOPs vs Real Work: The Importance of Replication in AI Efficiency Assessment
arXiv:2608.14550v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI efficiency has recently taken the spotlight in both academy and industry due to massive model scales, high energy demands, and environmental costs. While reporting Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) is a traditional approach for assessing computational costs, the relationship between FLOPs and execution time is not straightforward, as layers with the same number of FLOPs may not have the same execution time because some operations are more easily parallelized than others. This paper sets out to replicate the original experiments from a study that proposed the $\alpha-FLOPs$ estimation formula to verify whether the results remain applicable on newer, more powerful hardware. During the replication process, we identify limitations in the replication materials provided by the original study, including a lack of specific dependency details and transparency regarding regression data. Our results validate the thesis that raw FLOPs alone are not an appropriate metric for execution time, as spatial dimensions remain more easily parallelized than kernel dimensions. However, fine-grained measurements reveal that the relationship is much less straightforward than previously shown, with newer hardware exhibiting instabilities and discontinuities in execution time, including jumps and oscillations, that the $\alpha-FLOPs$ formula generally underestimates. Ultimately, this work validates the empirical findings from the original study but shows negative results when applying the $\alpha-FLOPs$ estimation. We also highlight the critical need
arXiv AI 研究研究动态查看详情